It is hard to believe that three years have passed since my prostatectomy. I am still cancer free. I am less fit physically; but in better health. My Diabetes is under fantastic control with an A1C of 6. My LDL is 67 my HDL is 58 and Triglyceride is 75! PSA is .004 (negligible). BP is 120/70.
Additionally, I am enjoying my family and friends. My spirit is positive. The side effects I have are impossible for me to pin on a cause. It could be cardio meds, diabetes meds, BP meds, or surgery. I honestly don't know.
I do know that although I cannot do what I did eight years ago, before a heart attack, before diabetes, and before cancer, I can pretty well function as a man in his early sixties. I can't labor all day with the best of them, as I once did, but I can take care of myself and family.
My long bout with idiosyncratic constipation has finally ended. Without clinical proof, I believe it was started with very strong antibiotics and hydrocodone 7.50/750. It was finally ended with a month long course of pro-biotics. My intestinal flora are back in balance and moving.
There has been a lot of talk lately about the efficacy of screening for cancer of the prostate or other organs. I wonder who is behind the studies and analysis of old study data. Is it possible that they are funded by insurance companies? Are the doctors compensated now or have they ever been compensated by insurance companies? What are their political philosophies?
Friday, April 30, 2010
Friday, October 16, 2009
Another Six Months and ...
August 23, 2009 I checked the bicycles for a Labor Day trip to Michigan. I checked Sally's bike, inflated the tires and lubricated the chain, adjusted the brakes and rode it around the block. It worked good. Then I did the same for mine and rode it around the block. I got the bike rack out and mounted it on the truck and got the tie downs out. I am ready for Grand Haven!
Monday morning I had blood in my urine and a couple of clots floating in the bowl. I didn't have any pain of note. Just some mile 'awareness'. It became less each time I voided during the day. Tuesday onward I didn't see any and assumed it must be from the bike ride. I wasn't too alarmed other than to remember to mention it on my next visit with the doctor.
I have been in a diabetes study group for the insurance company. I don't know what that is for; but it has required closer monitoring. The insurance company has not paid me. They have required me to visit the doctor every three months for blood test and check up. So it has actually cost me more. But this time I was going to the doctor on Friday, August 28, and would mention the blood then.
The doctor ordered a urinalysis and PSA; it did show microscopic hematuria. If you see it with the naked eye it is gross hematuria. If it is detectable but not visible it is microscopic. He said a lot of people have that and it is probably nothing. He didn't think it was from the bike ride. He wanted to see me again in a week and we would check again.
So it was back to the doctor again on Friday, September 4. Another urinalysis, another positive for microscopic hematuria. The PSA was .004 (zero) so it isn't a return of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Better go to the urologist to see what the continuing bleeding is from. Referral was ordered and I made an appointment for September 23, Wednesday.
They too found blood in the urine and asked for an abdominal and pelvic CT with and without contrast and a cystoscopy. Since I have BCBSIL HMO my urologist can't order tests. That means another trip to the Primary Care Physician. He ordered the tests and I waited for the referrals. Nothing by Friday so I called IPA and she said, "They are working on it right now. It will be ready by Tuesday, September 8, because of the holiday.
Wednesday, September 30, the imaging lab called to make an appointment. They had the referral and we are all set for the week after I return from my trip. We are going to my reunion and to visit family. (The trip was a blast)
The Scans were done. I got the cystoscopy. My urologist said I healed great. Except for the absence of the prostate you couldn't tell I had any work done in there. The scans were good. The old granulomas are unchanged, the one lymph node is unchanged and the Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm has not grown beyond 3.6 cm. I am cancer free and good for another six months. The bleeding was probably from riding the bicycle for the first time since the surgery. Adjust the seat to provide relief for the urethra and take it easy.
Keep up with your checkups. Live well and stay tuned.
Monday morning I had blood in my urine and a couple of clots floating in the bowl. I didn't have any pain of note. Just some mile 'awareness'. It became less each time I voided during the day. Tuesday onward I didn't see any and assumed it must be from the bike ride. I wasn't too alarmed other than to remember to mention it on my next visit with the doctor.
I have been in a diabetes study group for the insurance company. I don't know what that is for; but it has required closer monitoring. The insurance company has not paid me. They have required me to visit the doctor every three months for blood test and check up. So it has actually cost me more. But this time I was going to the doctor on Friday, August 28, and would mention the blood then.
The doctor ordered a urinalysis and PSA; it did show microscopic hematuria. If you see it with the naked eye it is gross hematuria. If it is detectable but not visible it is microscopic. He said a lot of people have that and it is probably nothing. He didn't think it was from the bike ride. He wanted to see me again in a week and we would check again.
So it was back to the doctor again on Friday, September 4. Another urinalysis, another positive for microscopic hematuria. The PSA was .004 (zero) so it isn't a return of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Better go to the urologist to see what the continuing bleeding is from. Referral was ordered and I made an appointment for September 23, Wednesday.
They too found blood in the urine and asked for an abdominal and pelvic CT with and without contrast and a cystoscopy. Since I have BCBSIL HMO my urologist can't order tests. That means another trip to the Primary Care Physician. He ordered the tests and I waited for the referrals. Nothing by Friday so I called IPA and she said, "They are working on it right now. It will be ready by Tuesday, September 8, because of the holiday.
Wednesday, September 30, the imaging lab called to make an appointment. They had the referral and we are all set for the week after I return from my trip. We are going to my reunion and to visit family. (The trip was a blast)
The Scans were done. I got the cystoscopy. My urologist said I healed great. Except for the absence of the prostate you couldn't tell I had any work done in there. The scans were good. The old granulomas are unchanged, the one lymph node is unchanged and the Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm has not grown beyond 3.6 cm. I am cancer free and good for another six months. The bleeding was probably from riding the bicycle for the first time since the surgery. Adjust the seat to provide relief for the urethra and take it easy.
Keep up with your checkups. Live well and stay tuned.
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Only One In Fifty
Here is an article in MSNBC on Prostate screening efficacy.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29745004/
If you read it, or if you have heard in the news lately, there is a circulating tale about screening. The story is that: the PSA blood test is of no benefit and may be a negative. DRE (digital rectal examination) is not a benefit, is embarrassing. Screening for Prostate cancer is not worth the cost, the embarrassment nor the harm.
Now a larger European study indicates a 20% improved survival. So the American studies release early to counter.
Read it for yourself and make-up your own mind. For my part, I am certain that I made the right choice. I am glad my doctor screened . I went to the doctor for my health. I didn't like having blood drawn. I didn't like getting poked in the bum. When the PSA was positive I was very apprehensive about the biopsy. I was thrilled the first time the biopsy was negative.
My doctor screened again and the PSA was elevated further. The DRE indicated that my prostate was smooth and still small. But the PSA warranted another visit to the urologist. We did another biopsy. It was positive.
I made the treatment choice. That is as it should be. My choice for surgery saved me from later treatment. The American proponents put forth the idea that my cancer may have been slow growing. They think I may not have needed to do anything. If I died at 73 I would only have suffered a short spell of symptoms. They may be okay with that; but I'm NOT.
My personal opinion is that the Insurance industry is behind the claim that screening does not save lives. For years it was touted that early detection made cures possible. Catch cancer before it metastasizes and before it gets out of hand, while it can be effectively treated.
Now they claim that is not true. That defies logic for me. I urge you to ask your doctor for screening. If they refuse then find a new doctor. I can assure you that having screened when I had no symptoms found cancer while still contained in the interior of my prostate. Removal of the prostate left me cancer free. Da Vinci robotic assisted surgery spared nerves and retained full function. I have no negative impact, save a small scar a bit over one inch below my umbilicus.
And when I see those advertisements on television for Flomax or Avodart, I know that I will NEVER have BPH or a need for those drugs. I won't be getting up multiple times per night to go. I won't be stopping my activities when out with friends to find a toilet. I don't see the negative.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29745004/
If you read it, or if you have heard in the news lately, there is a circulating tale about screening. The story is that: the PSA blood test is of no benefit and may be a negative. DRE (digital rectal examination) is not a benefit, is embarrassing. Screening for Prostate cancer is not worth the cost, the embarrassment nor the harm.
Now a larger European study indicates a 20% improved survival. So the American studies release early to counter.
Read it for yourself and make-up your own mind. For my part, I am certain that I made the right choice. I am glad my doctor screened . I went to the doctor for my health. I didn't like having blood drawn. I didn't like getting poked in the bum. When the PSA was positive I was very apprehensive about the biopsy. I was thrilled the first time the biopsy was negative.
My doctor screened again and the PSA was elevated further. The DRE indicated that my prostate was smooth and still small. But the PSA warranted another visit to the urologist. We did another biopsy. It was positive.
I made the treatment choice. That is as it should be. My choice for surgery saved me from later treatment. The American proponents put forth the idea that my cancer may have been slow growing. They think I may not have needed to do anything. If I died at 73 I would only have suffered a short spell of symptoms. They may be okay with that; but I'm NOT.
My personal opinion is that the Insurance industry is behind the claim that screening does not save lives. For years it was touted that early detection made cures possible. Catch cancer before it metastasizes and before it gets out of hand, while it can be effectively treated.
Now they claim that is not true. That defies logic for me. I urge you to ask your doctor for screening. If they refuse then find a new doctor. I can assure you that having screened when I had no symptoms found cancer while still contained in the interior of my prostate. Removal of the prostate left me cancer free. Da Vinci robotic assisted surgery spared nerves and retained full function. I have no negative impact, save a small scar a bit over one inch below my umbilicus.
And when I see those advertisements on television for Flomax or Avodart, I know that I will NEVER have BPH or a need for those drugs. I won't be getting up multiple times per night to go. I won't be stopping my activities when out with friends to find a toilet. I don't see the negative.
Thursday, February 5, 2009
If It Wasn't For Insurance ...
Well, it's been six months since my last follow-up. I've had no urinary issues at all. The plumbing is all working fine. All those things the urologist asks you about, good stream, good control, no issues with starting or stopping, etc. are great. PSA is 0.001! They apparently took all of my prostate and with it ALL of the cancer.
We will check again in six months. I couldn't be more satisfied with the outcome. There is no worry about a recurrence, metastatic cancer or as a bonus no future BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia). I am not going to have a need for Avodart or Flomax. I won't have a need for any of those uncomfortable prostate procedures. I have met some very skilled people who are a pleasure to talk with.
If you wonder why you have any issues with your insurance, remember they view themselves as financial companies. And we all know how well they are run. Get your checkups! It isn't embarrassing; it is science! And it's good for you! Contact me if you have any questions or just want to share your woes.
We will check again in six months. I couldn't be more satisfied with the outcome. There is no worry about a recurrence, metastatic cancer or as a bonus no future BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia). I am not going to have a need for Avodart or Flomax. I won't have a need for any of those uncomfortable prostate procedures. I have met some very skilled people who are a pleasure to talk with.
If you wonder why you have any issues with your insurance, remember they view themselves as financial companies. And we all know how well they are run. Get your checkups! It isn't embarrassing; it is science! And it's good for you! Contact me if you have any questions or just want to share your woes.
Monday, August 11, 2008
It Really Is Important
You shouldn't play George in Capra's "It's A Wonderful Life" thinking the world would be better off without you or that you don't matter. Do it for yourself, do it for a friend; Find a reason and get screened.
There is discussion now that PSA tests should not be done on men younger than fifty. And should not be done on men over fifty who are not for some reason in a high risk category. I don't understand that logic. It's as if 'they' are willing to lose one family member, of YOUR family, before the remainder of the family should be tested.
The argument is that the test does more harm than benefit. That isn't obvious to me. The claim is that a false positive result causes further testing with a TRUS or even a biopsy. The biopsy is slightly invasive and carries some risk in rare cases. But I don't understand not giving men a choice to test or to treat. If caught early you can be CURED. If not treated you MAY live fifteen years. Or it may be an aggressive form that will not give you fifteen years. But the final years will be hell.
Some argue that it is not imperative to treat immediately. In their argument, treatment may improve in several years to cure it later with far safer methods. They seem willing to make the bet with YOUR life that you will be treatable later or in fact may DIE of some other cause before you die of cancer. How BRAVE and generous of them.
Stay watchful and aware of the politics as well as the science of medicine. Especially your health.
Talk to your doctor about being screened soon.
There is discussion now that PSA tests should not be done on men younger than fifty. And should not be done on men over fifty who are not for some reason in a high risk category. I don't understand that logic. It's as if 'they' are willing to lose one family member, of YOUR family, before the remainder of the family should be tested.
The argument is that the test does more harm than benefit. That isn't obvious to me. The claim is that a false positive result causes further testing with a TRUS or even a biopsy. The biopsy is slightly invasive and carries some risk in rare cases. But I don't understand not giving men a choice to test or to treat. If caught early you can be CURED. If not treated you MAY live fifteen years. Or it may be an aggressive form that will not give you fifteen years. But the final years will be hell.
Some argue that it is not imperative to treat immediately. In their argument, treatment may improve in several years to cure it later with far safer methods. They seem willing to make the bet with YOUR life that you will be treatable later or in fact may DIE of some other cause before you die of cancer. How BRAVE and generous of them.
Stay watchful and aware of the politics as well as the science of medicine. Especially your health.
Talk to your doctor about being screened soon.
Thursday, August 7, 2008
August 6, 2008 Fifteen Months and Counting
Well, it's always something. I wanted to make an appointment with my primary care provider to get a blood draw for my PSA and A1C. Should be a snap after six years with her. But nooooo.
My doctor, whom I loved, left the group and they just said it was her choice. But, they have two doctors there to replace her and ... Oh wait a minute, they don't take your insurance "administrator". Yes they take my insurance but not through that admin group. But I can just call BCBSIL Customer Service.
No, you can't switch. The BCBSIL offers two HMO plans. They are both the same coverage, the same co-pay, the same drugs. One is about sixty dollars a month less. So of course I chose the one cheaper. OH, I see said the blind man. The difference is that the cheaper one has fewer doctors. All on HMO Illinois did not sign up on BLUE Advantage. And the Administrative group the new doctors are on don't accept BLUE Advantage. So I cannot switch.
I searched the Internet and found my original doctor very near. When I called the office the receptionist said, "Sure, just come in." Not so fast Maria. I didn't see my insurance on the web site and need to verify that first. Well she can't do that. She will have the office manager call me back.
Two days later I get the call. They do take BCBSIL but not with Tri-country (sic) claim administrator group. They only work through Advocate. (same as the 'new' doctors at the old medical group) And I can't switch to Advocate. In the Fall during open enrollment, I could select HMO Illinois and select Advocate. Just pay the extra sixty dollars, if it is still just sixty dollars. Or who knows if the offer will be the same companies.
The hoops you have to jump through are worse that the illness and treatment. Hopefully the insurance and doctor selection will work out as well as the health issues.
I went to another doctor in the medical group I've been with and had the blood tests. It went well. The referral is done and I was all set for my visit to the urologist.
That visit was easy and without issues. The PSA is perfect. There is no sign of cancer from the prostate. I have no issues to speak of. I am totally continent and without urinary problems. Good enough that I don't need to follow-up for six months.
My doctor, whom I loved, left the group and they just said it was her choice. But, they have two doctors there to replace her and ... Oh wait a minute, they don't take your insurance "administrator". Yes they take my insurance but not through that admin group. But I can just call BCBSIL Customer Service.
No, you can't switch. The BCBSIL offers two HMO plans. They are both the same coverage, the same co-pay, the same drugs. One is about sixty dollars a month less. So of course I chose the one cheaper. OH, I see said the blind man. The difference is that the cheaper one has fewer doctors. All on HMO Illinois did not sign up on BLUE Advantage. And the Administrative group the new doctors are on don't accept BLUE Advantage. So I cannot switch.
I searched the Internet and found my original doctor very near. When I called the office the receptionist said, "Sure, just come in." Not so fast Maria. I didn't see my insurance on the web site and need to verify that first. Well she can't do that. She will have the office manager call me back.
Two days later I get the call. They do take BCBSIL but not with Tri-country (sic) claim administrator group. They only work through Advocate. (same as the 'new' doctors at the old medical group) And I can't switch to Advocate. In the Fall during open enrollment, I could select HMO Illinois and select Advocate. Just pay the extra sixty dollars, if it is still just sixty dollars. Or who knows if the offer will be the same companies.
The hoops you have to jump through are worse that the illness and treatment. Hopefully the insurance and doctor selection will work out as well as the health issues.
I went to another doctor in the medical group I've been with and had the blood tests. It went well. The referral is done and I was all set for my visit to the urologist.
That visit was easy and without issues. The PSA is perfect. There is no sign of cancer from the prostate. I have no issues to speak of. I am totally continent and without urinary problems. Good enough that I don't need to follow-up for six months.
Wednesday, May 7, 2008
It's Official ...
I've made one more year. The results are in and my PSA is officially pronounced, "Undetectable! Perfect!" And a DRE confirms that healing has gone well.
My only disappointments today were first that insurance made a simple follow-up an exercise in frustration, aggravation and mediation. Secondly, the fact that I have to go back every three months for another year. Then every six months for the following three years. Of course that puts me on the path to a quarterly encounter with the insurance.
Back in December I went through a bit of a hassle getting a referral for a follow-up in January. They questioned, "why would you need to go back now? You were just there two months ago."
I had to explain that the doctor wanted three month follow-up visits and PSA tests to watch for the possible appearance of metastasized cancer. They sent the doctor a referral for two visits. Sounds like a good deal to me. When I went to get the blood test I was denied because it had not been THREE months since the last one. So I rescheduled my appointment with the urologist and my blood draw at the primary care physician. When I went back in January the blood test went well and I had no issue at the urologist.
My good fortune in that matter was an illusion. When I went to my primary care physician for the blood work again, they were questioning why we were doing it in April when we just did it in January. They checked and it was OK since it was April 30, the anniversary of my surgery.
Now it's May 7 and I went to the urologist for my 8:15 am appointment. I should have been in and out in fifteen minutes, because it was early, before they could get behind. No, there was a problem with my referral. It had one more visit open on it; but, it expired on April 30. (The date I needed to wait until to get my labs done.) The urologist's office had requested an extension on the thirtieth but had not received a response yet. The receptionist called the insurance and the doctor's group.
They weren't open. The voice mail said the they would "open promptly at eight-thirty a.m."
Of course they didn't. In fact at nine o'clock they weren't open, at least not answering the phones. I called my doctor about five after nine and Renee, there receptionist, was going to call a direct number and see if she could get it faxed to the urologist right away. So we waited.
I was just headed to the public men's room when my cell phone rang. Renee was explaining to me that she spoke to Violet and they were not able to fax the referral at this moment, but they would do it TODAY. I asked if she would mind explaining that to the office staff here because I didn't think they would believe me. She agreed and I handed my cell phone to the receptionist. They finished their conversation with the receptionist asking for a number where she could reach Renee and handed me my phone. I was all set. She would get me in to see the doctor as soon as possible. Of course this is one hour, forty-five minutes after I arrived and one and one half hours after my appointment.
"Pee in the cup, put your name on it and place it in the cabinet, please. You'll be in room one when you finish." Or words to that effect.
Wow! Peeing never transported me to another room before. I know she didn't misspeak. Syntax and alternative interpretations amuse me. I came out and went to room one and sat down. About five minutes later the same little girl, about five feet tall if she stands straight and petite, come's to the room and says, "Oh! There you are. How did you get here without being seen? I was right there."
I said, "I don't know; I'm pretty hard to miss." (being six feet two inches and and two-hundred seventy-seven pounds I don't usually slip by) She took the usual history, asked if I had my PSA tested and a list of my medicines and said the doctor would be in soon.
He was and said I was perfect. He wanted to do a DRE (I thought I had the last of those when they took my prostate out). He wanted to check on the healing, if the ureter healed well, with little scaring. He said it was great! I'm not sure how he meant that. I didn't think it was special.
Then he tells me he'll see me in three months. "THREE MONTHS?", I said. "I'll have to fight for that then."
He asked, "Why would you have to fight for that?"
So we had the discussion about referrals and about the hard time they gave me for seeing him every three months for the past year. He said, "You had cancer, for Christ sake you need to follow-up to monitor your health. It will be every three months for two years, then every six months for three years. Then annually. You want to be sure you're over it."
I tell you this NOT just to bitch. I'm telling this partly to let you know I too have my hassles with insurance. But, also in hopes you will do as I am doing and contact your insurance. We need to inform them that their process is BROKEN. Common sense should tell them that there is a linear sequence of events. Blood draw, lab work, result to doctor, referral to doctor, patient to doctor. It should not require the patient to call for each step and schedule the insurance office processes. We should not have to get approval for every step of the protocol individually. If they are covering treatment, in my case prostatecomy, then they should write a referral for the protocol.
Most people are aware that it is five years before doctors will talk about "cured". As process oriented as insurers are today, I would think they have a protocol for every treatment plan that they agree to pay for and the medical professionals agree is a 'standard' protocol. Having been diagnosed and verified by multiple tests the course of treatment being chosen and approved, the insurer should write the referral for the five year plan. The only caveat should be that I show up ALIVE and still insured by them.
The insurer has the trump cards. If I should die or be terminated by my employer or change insurance, or other wise lose coverage they can deny the claim submitted by the physician. If he was fraudulently filing claims and they deny it the doctor is not harmed because he didn't perform a service for which he is not paid.
Like the movie line, "I'm mad as Hell and I'm not gonna take it anymore!"
Call your insurer. Write your insurer. write to your state's Department of Insurance. Contact your legislators.
Be healthy and enjoy life. It's up to us to respond positively to stimuli. Keep smiling.
My only disappointments today were first that insurance made a simple follow-up an exercise in frustration, aggravation and mediation. Secondly, the fact that I have to go back every three months for another year. Then every six months for the following three years. Of course that puts me on the path to a quarterly encounter with the insurance.
Back in December I went through a bit of a hassle getting a referral for a follow-up in January. They questioned, "why would you need to go back now? You were just there two months ago."
I had to explain that the doctor wanted three month follow-up visits and PSA tests to watch for the possible appearance of metastasized cancer. They sent the doctor a referral for two visits. Sounds like a good deal to me. When I went to get the blood test I was denied because it had not been THREE months since the last one. So I rescheduled my appointment with the urologist and my blood draw at the primary care physician. When I went back in January the blood test went well and I had no issue at the urologist.
My good fortune in that matter was an illusion. When I went to my primary care physician for the blood work again, they were questioning why we were doing it in April when we just did it in January. They checked and it was OK since it was April 30, the anniversary of my surgery.
Now it's May 7 and I went to the urologist for my 8:15 am appointment. I should have been in and out in fifteen minutes, because it was early, before they could get behind. No, there was a problem with my referral. It had one more visit open on it; but, it expired on April 30. (The date I needed to wait until to get my labs done.) The urologist's office had requested an extension on the thirtieth but had not received a response yet. The receptionist called the insurance and the doctor's group.
They weren't open. The voice mail said the they would "open promptly at eight-thirty a.m."
Of course they didn't. In fact at nine o'clock they weren't open, at least not answering the phones. I called my doctor about five after nine and Renee, there receptionist, was going to call a direct number and see if she could get it faxed to the urologist right away. So we waited.
I was just headed to the public men's room when my cell phone rang. Renee was explaining to me that she spoke to Violet and they were not able to fax the referral at this moment, but they would do it TODAY. I asked if she would mind explaining that to the office staff here because I didn't think they would believe me. She agreed and I handed my cell phone to the receptionist. They finished their conversation with the receptionist asking for a number where she could reach Renee and handed me my phone. I was all set. She would get me in to see the doctor as soon as possible. Of course this is one hour, forty-five minutes after I arrived and one and one half hours after my appointment.
"Pee in the cup, put your name on it and place it in the cabinet, please. You'll be in room one when you finish." Or words to that effect.
Wow! Peeing never transported me to another room before. I know she didn't misspeak. Syntax and alternative interpretations amuse me. I came out and went to room one and sat down. About five minutes later the same little girl, about five feet tall if she stands straight and petite, come's to the room and says, "Oh! There you are. How did you get here without being seen? I was right there."
I said, "I don't know; I'm pretty hard to miss." (being six feet two inches and and two-hundred seventy-seven pounds I don't usually slip by) She took the usual history, asked if I had my PSA tested and a list of my medicines and said the doctor would be in soon.
He was and said I was perfect. He wanted to do a DRE (I thought I had the last of those when they took my prostate out). He wanted to check on the healing, if the ureter healed well, with little scaring. He said it was great! I'm not sure how he meant that. I didn't think it was special.
Then he tells me he'll see me in three months. "THREE MONTHS?", I said. "I'll have to fight for that then."
He asked, "Why would you have to fight for that?"
So we had the discussion about referrals and about the hard time they gave me for seeing him every three months for the past year. He said, "You had cancer, for Christ sake you need to follow-up to monitor your health. It will be every three months for two years, then every six months for three years. Then annually. You want to be sure you're over it."
I tell you this NOT just to bitch. I'm telling this partly to let you know I too have my hassles with insurance. But, also in hopes you will do as I am doing and contact your insurance. We need to inform them that their process is BROKEN. Common sense should tell them that there is a linear sequence of events. Blood draw, lab work, result to doctor, referral to doctor, patient to doctor. It should not require the patient to call for each step and schedule the insurance office processes. We should not have to get approval for every step of the protocol individually. If they are covering treatment, in my case prostatecomy, then they should write a referral for the protocol.
Most people are aware that it is five years before doctors will talk about "cured". As process oriented as insurers are today, I would think they have a protocol for every treatment plan that they agree to pay for and the medical professionals agree is a 'standard' protocol. Having been diagnosed and verified by multiple tests the course of treatment being chosen and approved, the insurer should write the referral for the five year plan. The only caveat should be that I show up ALIVE and still insured by them.
The insurer has the trump cards. If I should die or be terminated by my employer or change insurance, or other wise lose coverage they can deny the claim submitted by the physician. If he was fraudulently filing claims and they deny it the doctor is not harmed because he didn't perform a service for which he is not paid.
Like the movie line, "I'm mad as Hell and I'm not gonna take it anymore!"
Call your insurer. Write your insurer. write to your state's Department of Insurance. Contact your legislators.
Be healthy and enjoy life. It's up to us to respond positively to stimuli. Keep smiling.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)